I think that the facts are the most important thing to consider on this issue. It’s a simple as understanding that planting trees speeds up the amount of carbon taken out of the air. “The UK-based Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management estimates that 458 tonnes of carbon dioxide are stored within one hectare of mature oak woodland” (Houlder). It’s as simple as that, trees store a large amount of carbon and reduces the heat produced from the appearance of this greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide traps heat in the atmosphere and most of the controversy on this subject is from the ignorant companies like Fern that won’t accept the facts and are too concerned with other minor issues associated with change. Change is always difficult but a big part of forestry right now is towards the management of ecosystems and requires change in the current system. Forests aren’t being treated well enough and will have irreversible consequences if this goes unchanged. Major scaled planting of trees is a great idea but will take time, especially if people remain skeptical and remain unaware of the impact that carbon emissions have on the atmosphere.
Works Cited
Houlder,
Vanessa. "Trees Won't Cure the Greenhouse Effect: CLIMATE CHANGE: As Environmentalists
Meet in Milan, Vanessa Houlder Looks at the Controversy Surrounding the use of
Forestry to Offset Carbon Emissions:" Financial Times: 13. Dec 05
2003. ProQuest. Web. 17 Oct. 2013 .
No comments:
Post a Comment